Where are all the female head coaches?
I'm going on a bit of a journey (and it's a long read).
This time last week, I read the news that Giselle Mather had left her role at Trailfinders. The story was broke by Fiona Tomas at the Telegraph.
This time last year we were heading into the first season of revamped top flight women’s rugby, the PWR.
Out of the total of 9 teams that completed the league (University of Worcester Warriors sadly dropped out), there were 5 female Head Coaches/DoRs. It doesn’t take a maths genius, and I’m certainly not one, to work out that’s over 50%.
Over the Summer, this has now dropped to 2 female Head Coaches/DoRs: Susie Appleby at Exeter Chiefs and Rachel Taylor at Sale Sharks.
Giselle Mather has left Trailfinders, Vicky MacQueen has left Leicester Tigers and Amy Turner has moved into a men’s pathway role at Harlequins.
I fired out a comment on social media and
mentioned that it was a similar story in Aotearoa New Zealand in their equivilent of the PWR: Super Rugby Aupiki.So how have we got here?
1 year out from the World Cup and England’s top flight women’s league has 2 female Head Coaches/DoRs. 2 years after Aotearoa New Zealand hosted the World Cup, Super Rugby Aupiki has 1 female coach confirmed so far. These are the top two women’s teams in the current World Rugby rankings.
Ask me anyday and I will tell you the joys and difficulties of being a female coach. This is not to say that there aren’t challenges elsewhere, but I can only speak from my authentic experiences as white, female coach.
I’ve spoken and written about the frustrating realities of being a female coach and published guest articles on sexism within coaching.
Stereotyping
I’ve been assumed to have any other role than a coach, because there’s a bias that coaches don’t look like me. I’ve also had my competency repeatedly challenged, assuming my level of tactical and technical knowledge isn’t proficient for coaching.
I’m not alone in experiencing this. I’ve written before of Professor Sophia Jowett’s work.
"We are brought up and socialised in ways that lead us to think that men are agentic (assertive, strong, decisive, tough) and women are communal (empathic, caring, considerate, nurturing). While these stereotypes are unfounded, they result in making us believe that men make better coaches as they are seen to better fit the societal view of what a prototypical coach leader should be.” -Professor Sophia Jowett
Gender bias and stereotypes mean that male coaches are seen as better leaders and therefore better coaches. In the infographics, linked above and at the end of the article, it also mentions that female coaches have to prove their compentcy repeatedly.
In some work done by Leanne Norman at Leeds Beckett, she examines why the number of female coaches and coach developers in low in the Football Association (FA). Norman states that the lack of female coaches is a symptom of a wider problem, which includes organisation practices.
One of the main findings from the work was that for career progression there needs to be clearly defined pathways and support at each stage of the journey. This is something I’ve found difficult within rugby. I feel any pathway, if there is one, is muddled.
I recently tried to explain the barriers I face and the career path to my Dad using a glass, coffee mug and napkin. It feels as if you have to feel your way through your own journey, climbing up a sheer cliff face with no ropes.
It can feel daunting when there’s no template to follow. There is a loose pathway, but it seems to exist solely for players who have represented their country. I have no problem with ex-international players going onto coaching. However, if it is the only pathway, then we reduce the number of coaches and prevent other experiences and people from progression.
“The underrepresentation of women coaches needs to be understood as a symptom or an outcome of a deeper issue, rather than the problem in itself.” - Leanne Norman
Isolation
If you’re a female rugby coach, then it is an isolating experience. No matter what level you’re coaching or the experience of your players. Simply because, you are on your own.
Returning the work of Leanne Norman, she spoke to coaches to explore microinvalidations. These are seemingly small interactions, like assuming there is someone else in charge because biases say the head coach can’t be a woman.
The constant invalidation of coaches’ competency prevents female coaches from progressing and applying for further opportunities. It also can be exhausting.
I know this, because it happens to me. I’ve experienced it formally within coach education environments and within informal, everyday, situations. The assumption that you have a passing knowledge and lack any in depth information is tiring and frustrating.
(Sidenote: I’ve had some really positive experiences where I’ve been highlighted for discussions or adding insight, and felt valued. If you’ve been one of these people, then I want to thank you, because validation and recognition is powerful.)
“Jackie reported feeling as if she was an “alien” in the all-male coaching world for most of her career. As the only women in her space, she represented the unknown and an outsider. Jackie believed her feelings were partly the product of the culture of high-performance coaching. Being an “only” amplifies surveillance in an already “hyper-surveillant” culture.” - Leanne Norman
So, how do we begin to make this better?
Work has to be done to diversify spaces (and it is). Not just so that more women have a chance to progress in sport, but everyone. It’s my firm belief that diversity in the room will result in a diversity of ideas.
As Leanne Norman wrote, we need to move away from tickbox exercises to try and effect change. It’s not enough to try to increase the number of female coaches if they’re not supported and don’t progress.
Numbers look great on paper: ‘the amount of female coaches increased to X. Job done’. However, if those coaches don’t feel supported whether they’re coaching part time, full time, volunteer, at Championship or PWR, at Inner Warrior or NC3, schools or universities, it defeats the purpose.
We cannot simply flood the system and expect it to change. We have to change the system.
I’m not wholly sure what programs will work and what the changes should be. However, I know that some plans should be created as female-specific and other changes should be made with a view to benefit all coaches and all pathways.
I believe removing barriers to coach education and reforming the certificates is an important step.
I also think regular mentoring, outside of formal coach education, would be valuable. I’ve had some excellent mentors that I’ve used outside of obtaining certificates, shoutout to Russell Earnshaw as someone who is always in my corner and always keen for a chat about coaching.
I keep returning to a pipe dream idea I have about internships. Imagine a grassroots coach and a championship/PWR/Premiership coach. Now imagine them coaching within each other’s environments for a period of time, and the benefits it would bring to both coaches.
I’ve always said that coaching grassroots rugby makes better coaches: different challenges each week, varying number of players, not relying on rugby jargon, the list goes on. Imagine the exchanges between coaches that would happen if there was an internship.
I’ve also another pipe dream about funding for women’s advocates to allow people to be able to amazing work and have long lasting impact.
“All-male collectives become fertile grounds for gendered microinvalidations because they alienate and disempower women through the denial of opportunities to progress which in turn allows the perpetuation of gendered roles and stereotypes that are the basis of gendered microinvalidations.” - Leanne Norman
Another step, is by talking about it. Research is being done. That’s important, but it’s also vital to ensure the research isn’t contained behind the walls of academia. It needs to be talked about, and the voices of coaches and women within sport need to be heard.
It’s one reason why I’ve spent this week writing this piece, and why I’m excited to be a part of Women of Union.
I could be fiercer about my experiences, share horror stories (I can also share positive ones).
But the more we talk, share, advocate and campaign, change will come…it needs to.
Further reading:
Gendered microaggressions towards the “only” women coaches in high-performance sport
I think it's a great point about the research not being kept behind the walls of academia, but I also think that it needs to be talked about in language that is none academic so that good conversations can take place. My second thought is that more conversations need to happen around the groups of people who are displaying the bias towards female coaches as I know, from experience, it's not always men. My Daughter plays hockey and has a male and female coach, and they both coach on different aspects of the game, but the girls react differently to the male than they do the female. It's only subtle differences, but there are differences in how they listen, respond and behave around the two coaches. You know Hols and you know how open she can be when we have conversations around this stuff and she has said that when the team practice (I don't stand on the side lines when my kids train because they don't need to hear me or parents, they need to hear the coach) other parents have been heard saying things like "Ooh, coach 'x' is being a bit bossy tonight". I've asked her why coach'x' was being bossy and she tells me that she wasn't being bossy but she had to shout to get the girls to stop talking and listen. There are so many things we could pick apart from that small comment such as :
Parents not supporting a female coach
Young girls behaving differently for the female coach
Female coaches actions being interpreted differently
Parents not correcting behavior directed towards female coaches
but, fundamentally I think the bias is not just from men and that sometimes concerns me more. I could chat to you for ages about this so I've save it for training next week :-)
Great writing 👏